A tragic road accident on Mumbai’s Coastal Road claimed three lives early Sunday after a speeding BMW crashed through a barrier and fell from a bridge into an under-construction parking area. CCTV footage captured the dramatic moments of the accident, showing the luxury vehicle travelling at high speed before losing control and plunging from the elevated section.

The accident took place at around 5:20 a.m. on September 20, 2026, while the BMW was travelling from Marine Drive towards Haji Ali. According to officials, the vehicle crashed near Lotus Jetty, opposite Lala Lajpatrai College. The car reportedly hit a boundary or edge barrier before falling from the bridge.

The CCTV footage has provided investigators with an important visual record of what happened. It shows the BMW approaching the area at considerable speed before suddenly crashing through the roadside barrier. The vehicle then falls from the elevated road and lands in an area where parking-related construction work was underway. The impact caused extensive damage to the car.

Four people were travelling in the BMW at the time of the crash. All four were taken to civic-run Nair Hospital following the accident. Three occupants were declared dead, while the fourth suffered serious injuries and was admitted to the trauma ward in critical condition.

Two of the deceased were identified as 21-year-old Shanay Gajjal and 17-year-old Dhairya Seth. The third deceased occupant, a man believed to be around 25 years old, had not been identified at the time of the initial police statement. The injured passenger was also initially reported as unidentified.

The circumstances surrounding the crash are now being examined by Mumbai Police. Investigators are expected to look at the speed of the vehicle, the driver’s actions immediately before the crash, road conditions and other factors that may have contributed to the accident.

The accident has once again brought attention to road safety on Mumbai’s Coastal Road. The corridor is designed as an access-controlled route and has designated speed restrictions. According to information reported by NDTV, the maximum speed on the main carriageway is 80 kmph, while lower limits apply in tunnels, ramps, curves and interchanges.

The Coastal Road has become an important transport corridor connecting different parts of Mumbai and is designed to reduce travelling time. Its smooth and relatively uninterrupted stretches can allow vehicles to travel quickly, making adherence to speed limits and lane discipline particularly important.

For investigators, the CCTV footage could prove significant in reconstructing the sequence of events. Police will also examine the vehicle, the crash site and other available evidence as part of the inquiry.

The deaths of three young occupants have turned what was a routine early-morning journey into a fatal tragedy. The investigation will determine the precise circumstances that led to the BMW leaving the road and falling from the bridge.

A disturbing case has emerged from northwest Delhi after the decomposed body of a teenage girl was found in an open field in the Swaroop Nagar area. Police said the girl had allegedly been sexually assaulted and stabbed to death before her body was abandoned near Kushak Road.

The case came to light on the morning of September 13, when local residents informed Delhi Police about a body lying in a field. According to police, stray dogs had reached the body, which was already in an advanced state of decomposition. The condition of the remains was reportedly so severe that investigators could not immediately determine the victim’s gender.

Police later identified the deceased as a teenage girl. Different reports published on September 18 have described her age as 16 or 17, reflecting an inconsistency in early reporting. Police said she had allegedly been gang-raped and stabbed before her body was dumped in the field.

Investigators said the girl was acquainted with the people now being held in connection with the case. According to the police version, she had travelled with them in a tempo on the day of the incident. The group allegedly spent time together before the assault and killing.

The investigation initially faced a major challenge because there appeared to be no direct eyewitness to the crime. The victim had also not been reported missing by her family. Police said the family told investigators that she would sometimes leave home and return after several days.

Investigators therefore turned to technical evidence and surveillance footage. More than 50 CCTV cameras covering the suspected route and surrounding areas were examined. During the analysis, police noticed a tempo moving around the relevant area at the time connected to the crime.

The vehicle’s registration number was initially difficult to identify because of darkness and poor visibility. Investigators nevertheless followed the vehicle’s movement through different CCTV locations and eventually traced it to Khadda Colony in the Swaroop Nagar area.

The tempo driver was questioned, and police said his interrogation helped investigators identify other suspects. Four people were subsequently apprehended, including three juveniles. The adult accused has been identified by police as Shivam alias Sudama alias Chuchu.

Police said two knives allegedly connected with the killing, clothing allegedly worn by the suspects and the tempo were recovered. The authorities have registered a case under relevant provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act.

The investigation remains ongoing. Police are examining forensic and technical evidence to establish the sequence of events and determine the individual role of each person in custody.

A major legal development has brought the death of Disha Salian, former manager of late actor Sushant Singh Rajput, back into the spotlight. Satish Salian, Disha’s father, has issued a legal notice seeking Rs 500 crore in damages from Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Aaditya Thackeray and former Maharashtra home minister Anil Deshmukh. The notice concerns statements that, according to Satish Salian, portrayed his pursuit of justice for his daughter as politically motivated.

Disha Salian, 28, died on June 8, 2020, after falling from a high-rise residential building in Mumbai’s Malad area. At the time, the incident was recorded by police as an accidental death. Her death received renewed public attention because Sushant Singh Rajput died six days later. Rajput had previously worked with Salian professionally, and the two cases became the subject of extensive public discussion.

According to the latest reports, Satish Salian had approached the Bombay High Court seeking a fresh investigation into his daughter’s death. His legal efforts included allegations that several individuals’ roles should be examined. The matter has now entered a new phase after the Central Bureau of Investigation registered an FIR and began investigating the circumstances surrounding Salian’s death.

The Rs 500 crore notice alleges that statements made by Aaditya Thackeray and Anil Deshmukh questioned the motives behind Satish Salian’s legal efforts. The notice reportedly objects to descriptions of his campaign for investigation as politically motivated, malicious or intended to target Thackeray.

The notice also reportedly disputes the claim that the CBI had already investigated the matter and cleared Aaditya Thackeray. According to the legal notice, such statements were allegedly damaging to Satish Salian’s reputation and portrayed him as someone improperly using the legal system.

The notice seeks more than financial compensation. It reportedly demands an unconditional and public apology from both politicians. The apology, according to reports, is sought across print, television and digital platforms, with specific requirements concerning its publication and duration.

Aaditya Thackeray has rejected the allegations connecting him to Disha Salian. In a statement posted on X on September 16, he said that he had never met or known Salian. He described attempts to repeatedly connect his name to the case as an evidence-free campaign and called for the official investigation to proceed without political interference or character assassination.

The legal notice comes at a significant moment because the CBI has now formally entered the case. The agency registered an FIR on September 14, according to reports, following the Bombay High Court’s direction for a thorough investigation. The FIR reportedly includes several names whose roles require investigation, including Aaditya Thackeray, Dino Morea, Sooraj Pancholi and others. Being named for investigation does not by itself establish criminal responsibility.

The case therefore involves several separate legal developments: the original death investigation, the family’s demand for a fresh probe, the recent CBI FIR and the new defamation notice. The allegations made by the parties remain subject to legal and investigative processes.

For now, the Rs 500 crore demand represents a claim made through a legal notice rather than a court judgment awarding damages. The CBI investigation is also ongoing, meaning that questions surrounding the circumstances of Disha Salian’s death remain under official examination.

A disturbing road-rage incident on Gurugram’s Golf Course Road has sparked concern over road safety after a woman riding a sports motorcycle was allegedly hit by a car following her and her biking group. The incident, involving a woman identified as Sia, was captured on camera and later shared online, drawing widespread attention.

According to reports, Sia was riding an Aprilia RS 457 with other members of a biking group when a Haryana-registered car began following them. The vehicle allegedly remained unusually close to the riders, creating an uncomfortable and potentially dangerous situation. Sia reportedly asked the occupants of the car to maintain a safe distance and stay away from the group.

Instead of moving away, the car allegedly continued to follow the bikers. The situation reportedly became increasingly tense as the riders continued along Golf Course Road. Sia said she did not want to stop and confront the people inside the vehicle because she felt unsafe.

A friend riding behind her reportedly tried to act as a protective barrier between Sia and the car. Despite the efforts to avoid a confrontation, the vehicle allegedly moved toward Sia’s motorcycle and struck it.

The impact threw the woman off her sports bike and caused the motorcycle to slide along the road for several metres. Video footage of the incident reportedly shows the car moving into the biker’s path before the collision. The footage has become a key part of the public discussion surrounding the case.

What happened immediately afterward has also raised concerns. Reports say the car did not stop to assist the injured rider and instead fled the scene. Such conduct has intensified criticism of the alleged driver and raised questions about accountability in road-rage incidents.

Sia later spoke about the incident online and described how unsafe she felt on Gurugram roads. Her account attracted significant attention from fellow bikers and social media users, many of whom urged the authorities to identify the vehicle and take appropriate action.

The episode has also renewed debate over the safety of two-wheeler riders in busy urban areas. Motorcyclists are considerably more vulnerable than occupants of cars during collisions. Even a relatively small impact can throw a rider onto the road and result in serious injuries.

The incident is particularly concerning because it allegedly began with something as basic as a request to maintain a safe distance. Road users are expected to respect one another’s space, especially when travelling at speed. Following another vehicle aggressively or attempting to force it to stop can quickly turn a traffic disagreement into a dangerous confrontation.

Police are expected to examine the available video footage and other evidence as part of the investigation. The incident has also led to calls for stronger enforcement against reckless driving and road rage.

For many road users, the case is a reminder that an ordinary journey can become dangerous within seconds when patience and basic traffic discipline disappear. The focus now remains on identifying the car and determining exactly what happened before, during and after the collision.

World Alzheimer’s Month shifts the spotlight on cognitive health. Every September brings global efforts to challenge the stigma of dementia. Globally, we are experiencing a shifting medical landscape where old assumptions no longer apply. Medical science has moved past slow behavioral observations. Researchers now focus on biological markers to spot disease activity early.

Alzheimer’s disease, the most common type of dementia, is a chronic brain illness which causes the destruction of memory, cognitive functions, and ability to perform everyday chores. This illness is caused by the buildup of protein deposits in the brain called amyloid plaques and tau tangles which result in cell death and atrophy of brain tissue. Older adults, especially those over 65, are most vulnerable. Progressing over time, Alzheimer’s eventually affects language, judgment, and behavior.

Most Common Symptoms of Alzheimer’s Disease

The most common symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease are listed below:

• Memory impairment which affects daily life and includes repetitive questioning and forgetfulness.
• Planning issues, problems with solving problems, performing calculations.
• Confusion about time, dates, and occurrences.
• Difficulties with visual images and perception of spaces and distance.
• Problems with vocabulary usage in speech or writing, inability to finish thoughts and sentences.
• Losing things and failure to return back to track.
• Impaired judgment, especially with finances and grooming.
• Social withdrawal from responsibilities and interests.
• Changes in mood and personality, becoming anxious, suspicious, or depressed.

The Blood Test Breakthrough: Spotting Alzheimer’s Indicators Long Before Symptoms Begin 

Blood biomarker tests change how doctors find Alzheimer’s indicators. Traditional detection methods required expensive scans or painful spinal taps. New plasma tests measure specific proteins like phosphorylated tau. These tiny protein fragments float in your bloodstream long before memory loss begins. Clinical data proves these blood assays identify toxic plaque accumulation years prior to visible symptoms. Early detection gives you a distinct window for intervention.

Beyond Symptom Control: New Immunotherapies Alter the Course of Cognitive Decline

New generation immunotherapies alter disease trajectories. Drugs like lecanemab and donanemab target the root biological causes. These monoclonal antibodies instruct your immune system to clear harmful amyloid deposits from brain tissue. Clinical trials show these treatments slow cognitive decline by roughly one third over eighteen months. Patients retain independence longer. Families gain precious months of stable functioning. These medications represent a stark shift from older therapies that only managed surface symptoms.

Why Medical Breakthroughs Require Robust Social Infrastructure

Medical progress demands matching social infrastructure. Diagnostic breakthroughs mean little without robust community support. Families bear heavy burdens when managing daily care needs. Many households lack access to trained home health aides. Localized memory care facilities remain scarce in rural and low income regions. Specialized centers are essential for proper patient monitoring during advanced treatment phases. The need of the hour is community spaces designed for cognitive safety and social engagement.

Combining Pills with People: The Case for Comprehensive Care and Respite Services 

Medical experts will agree that healthcare systems must expand caregiver support programs. Governments and local organizations need to fund respite care services. Training programs will go a long way in helping families manage behavioral changes safely. Without structured assistance, informal caregivers will continue to face severe burnout and health risks. Comprehensive care requires combining advanced pharmacology with local human support.

Common Misconceptions Associated with Alzheimer’s Disease

1. Memory loss is a typical and inescapable symptom of aging and not an illness.
2. Both terms “Alzheimer’s disease” and “dementia” are medically the same and have no difference.
3. Direct exposure to aluminum in various forms from day-to-day objects leads to developing the disease.
4. Only the older population who are in the final stage of their life can get Alzheimer’s symptoms.
5. Various herbs and vitamins are perfectly safe for preventing and treating the disease.
6. People with Alzheimer’s do not feel anything in their surroundings and lose the ability to relate emotionally to others.

Conclusion

It is clear that Alzheimer’s disease continues to be rated as one of the most complicated medical challenges faced in the modern era. With growing numbers of people slipping into old age across the globe, it is predicted that the disease will become more prevalent in the years to come. 

Research is advancing in many different areas, such as the search for biomarkers in order to diagnose the disease earlier, the connection of Alzheimer’s to genetics in order to understand risks better, and new treatments which aim to stop its progression and not just treat symptoms. Although treatments currently available cannot do much for patients, the progress made in immunotherapy, lifestyle changes, and digital health tracking is quite encouraging and is looked upon as a positive sign. 

It is becoming increasingly clear that Alzheimer’s is not only a disease, but also a global problem and needs to be dealt with accordingly.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India is considering changes to the settlement mechanism for derivatives following concerns over market volatility during the newly introduced Closing Auction Session.

The regulator’s review focuses on one of the most important links between India’s cash and derivatives markets: the price used to settle futures and options contracts at expiry.

The Closing Auction Session, introduced from August 3, was designed to improve closing-price discovery in the equity cash market. Under the earlier system, the closing price was primarily determined using the volume-weighted average price of trades executed during the last 30 minutes of continuous trading. SEBI’s new system introduced an auction-based process intended to aggregate liquidity and produce a more transparent closing price.

While the objective was to strengthen market efficiency, the implementation created challenges for derivatives trading, particularly on expiry days. The cash market’s closing auction and the derivatives market’s trading schedule did not fully align, creating a period in which traders could face uncertainty about the underlying price used for settlement.

This became particularly significant because derivatives contracts can react rapidly to changes in the underlying security or index. On expiry days, a movement in the final settlement price can substantially affect the value of options and futures positions.

SEBI said it had received feedback from various market participants after observing the initial functioning of CAS. On September 3, the regulator announced that it would review the methodology used for determining settlement prices of derivative contracts in light of the CAS rollout.

The latest consultation paper goes further by outlining two possible approaches.

Under the first approach, SEBI is considering a blended volume-weighted average price. This would combine trading information from the final 30 minutes of continuous trading with trades conducted during the Closing Auction Session. The objective would be to create a settlement price that reflects both regular trading activity and the auction process.

The second approach would rely on the final 30 minutes of continuous trading without incorporating the CAS price into derivatives expiry settlement. This could serve as an interim solution while the market adjusts to the new closing-auction framework.

The review is significant because derivatives are a major component of India’s financial markets. Futures and options are used by institutional investors, traders and other participants for hedging, portfolio management and speculation.

A settlement mechanism needs to be predictable because traders build positions based on the expectation that the final settlement price will be determined according to clearly defined rules. Any uncertainty around the settlement methodology can affect trading strategies and risk management.

SEBI is therefore examining not only settlement prices but also the broader functioning of the closing period. It has proposed changes related to the display of indicative prices, treatment of orders and the duration of the post-auction period.

The regulator is considering stopping the display of indicative index closing values during CAS. Officials believe this could reduce the possibility of traders misinterpreting temporary auction information. However, indicative equilibrium prices for individual stocks may continue to be displayed.

SEBI is also considering a restriction on cancelling limit orders that are placed more than 1% away from the reference price. Such a measure could help reduce unusual order behaviour during the sensitive closing period.

The proposals are currently not final. SEBI has invited stakeholders to submit comments before October 3. Feedback from exchanges, brokers, institutional investors, trading firms and other market participants will likely influence the final framework.

The review shows that SEBI is attempting to preserve the core objective of CAS while addressing practical problems that emerged after its implementation.

For investors, the key issue will be whether the final settlement system can provide both accurate price discovery and stability. For the regulator, the task is to ensure that the closing mechanism strengthens India’s market infrastructure without unintentionally increasing expiry-day risks.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have reportedly been left surprised after King Charles III made a formal clarification about their position within the British monarchy, reaffirming that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex remain non-working members of the Royal Family despite their return to the United Kingdom.

The development has once again placed Harry and Meghan at the centre of intense public attention. For years, the couple’s relationship with the monarchy has been closely watched following their decision in 2020 to step away from their roles as senior working royals and build an independent life outside the traditional royal structure.

According to recent reports, the letter was issued under the authority of King Charles and circulated to senior officials as guidance regarding the Sussexes’ official status. The message made clear that there had been no change to the arrangement established after Harry and Meghan stepped back from official royal duties.

The clarification is particularly significant because the couple’s return to Britain had led to speculation about whether their relationship with the monarchy might be entering a new phase. Questions had emerged about whether Prince Harry could once again take on certain official responsibilities or whether Meghan might resume public engagements connected to the Royal Family.

However, the King’s communication appears designed to remove any uncertainty.

The position outlined in the letter reportedly emphasizes that Harry and Meghan’s charitable activities are undertaken in a private capacity and that they are not carrying out official duties on behalf of the monarch or the British state.

The distinction between being a member of the Royal Family and being a working royal is an important one. Harry remains the King’s son and Meghan remains the Duchess of Sussex, but the couple no longer represents the monarchy through official engagements in the way senior working royals do.

The couple’s decision to step back from royal duties in 2020 marked one of the most dramatic changes in the modern history of the British monarchy. Their move eventually took them to the United States, where they developed commercial and media projects while continuing their charitable work independently.

Their recent return to Britain naturally revived questions about their future.

Would Harry and Meghan become more closely involved with the Royal Family? Could reconciliation with King Charles lead to a restoration of official duties? Would their children become more visible within the royal institution?

The King’s letter appears to answer at least one of those questions clearly: their official status has not changed.

Reports indicate that Harry and Meghan were surprised by the communication and its timing. The development has also generated discussion about the relationship between the Sussexes and Buckingham Palace, particularly because questions surrounding their security arrangements and public role remain sensitive issues.

For King Charles, the clarification may represent an attempt to protect the structure of the modern monarchy.

The Royal Family has increasingly emphasized a smaller group of senior members who carry out official duties. Maintaining a clear distinction between working royals and family members who pursue private lives is therefore important for the institution.

Harry and Meghan’s situation is unique because they remain internationally famous members of the Royal Family while simultaneously pursuing independent commercial and charitable activities.

This creates a complicated balance.

They are still connected to one of the world’s most famous royal institutions, yet they do not officially represent it.

For supporters of Harry and Meghan, the clarification may reinforce the couple’s right to build an independent life while maintaining their family identity. Critics, meanwhile, may argue that the distinction between royal status and private activity remains difficult because of their global fame and titles.

Whatever the reaction, King Charles’ message has brought the issue back into sharp focus.

The latest development makes one thing clear: Harry and Meghan may be back in Britain, but their return does not mean a return to their previous lives as senior working royals.