 May 23, 2025 However, Tharoor strongly countered this narrative, explaining that India did not require external persuasion to halt conflict, as it had never sought war in the first place. “We have enormous respect for the American presidency, but our understanding is different,” he said. “From the very beginning of the conflict on May 7, when Indian forces launched Operation Sindoor to retaliate against the terror attack, India made it clear it was not interested in prolonging the conflict.” The Congress leader stressed that the Indian military operation was a measured response aimed solely at terrorists, not an escalation to war. “If Pakistan had not reacted, India would not have responded,” he explained, underscoring that India’s primary objective has always been to focus on development and peace. Tharoor also clarified that any attempts at persuasion during the ceasefire discussions would have been directed at Pakistan, not India. “We don’t need to be persuaded to stop because we don’t want war,” he stated. “If there was any persuasion from the American president or officials, it would have been aimed at the Pakistanis.” The India-Pakistan ceasefire followed days of intense cross-border fighting triggered by the terror attack on April 22, which killed 26 people. India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). Pakistan retaliated with missile and drone strikes, which were largely thwarted by Indian defenses. Indian forces then struck airfields inside Pakistan, escalating tensions further until the ceasefire was agreed upon on May 10. India has maintained that the ceasefire resulted from direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of both countries. This official communication underlined a mutual desire to end hostilities without external mediation. Tharoor’s remarks come amid political debate in India, with his party questioning the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) over the narrative surrounding Trump’s involvement. The situation has brought attention to India’s firm stance against terrorism and its priority on peace and development rather than military conflict. As tensions ease with the ceasefire in place, India continues to assert its policy of zero tolerance towards terrorism while aiming to maintain stability in the region through diplomatic and strategic means. For More Interesting News Follow Us on Instagram){kind=link}
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor has publicly dismissed former US President Donald Trump’s repeated claims that he performed a pivotal function in facilitating the ceasefire between India and Pakistan in Could 2025. Tharoor made his remarks throughout a go to to america, the place he’s main an Indian parliamentary delegation centered on highlighting India’s zero-tolerance strategy in direction of terrorism.
President Trump had asserted that he efficiently prevented a possible nuclear struggle between the 2 neighboring nuclear-armed nations throughout heightened tensions following a lethal terror assault in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pahalgam area. Trump acknowledged in a press convention that his “deal” to halt hostilities and encourage commerce between India and Pakistan was his proudest achievement, claiming each side agreed to stop hearth by way of his intervention.
Jai Hind…. pic.twitter.com/KrSMwxNh14
— Shashi Tharoor (@ShashiTharoor) Could 23, 2025
Nevertheless, Tharoor strongly countered this narrative, explaining that India didn’t require exterior persuasion to halt battle, because it had by no means sought struggle within the first place. “We have now monumental respect for the American presidency, however our understanding is completely different,” he stated. “From the very starting of the battle on Could 7, when Indian forces launched Operation Sindoor to retaliate in opposition to the phobia assault, India made it clear it was not considering prolonging the battle.”
The Congress chief pressured that the Indian army operation was a measured response aimed solely at terrorists, not an escalation to struggle. “If Pakistan had not reacted, India wouldn’t have responded,” he defined, underscoring that India’s major goal has at all times been to give attention to improvement and peace.
Tharoor additionally clarified that any makes an attempt at persuasion throughout the ceasefire discussions would have been directed at Pakistan, not India. “We don’t have to be persuaded to cease as a result of we don’t need struggle,” he acknowledged. “If there was any persuasion from the American president or officers, it will have been aimed on the Pakistanis.”
The India-Pakistan ceasefire adopted days of intense cross-border combating triggered by the phobia assault on April 22, which killed 26 folks. India launched Operation Sindoor on Could 7, focusing on terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). Pakistan retaliated with missile and drone strikes, which have been largely thwarted by Indian defenses. Indian forces then struck airfields inside Pakistan, escalating tensions additional till the ceasefire was agreed upon on Could 10.
India has maintained that the ceasefire resulted from direct talks between the Administrators Common of Army Operations (DGMOs) of each nations. This official communication underlined a mutual need to finish hostilities with out exterior mediation.
Tharoor’s remarks come amid political debate in India, together with his get together questioning the ruling Bharatiya Janata Social gathering (BJP) over the narrative surrounding Trump’s involvement. The state of affairs has introduced consideration to India’s agency stance in opposition to terrorism and its precedence on peace and improvement fairly than army battle.
As tensions ease with the ceasefire in place, India continues to claim its coverage of zero tolerance in direction of terrorism whereas aiming to keep up stability within the area by way of diplomatic and strategic means.
For Extra Attention-grabbing Information Observe Us on Instagram