The investigation into the death of social media influencer and entrepreneur Twisha Sharma has now been handed over to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), marking a major development in a case that has captured national attention. At the same time, the Supreme Court has urged media organisations and digital platforms to avoid publishing unverified statements or speculative content related to the matter.
The case has remained in the spotlight since Twisha Sharma was found dead under suspicious circumstances earlier this year. Initial investigations were conducted by the state police, but growing public pressure, political debate, and demands from the victim’s family led to calls for a central agency probe. Responding to these concerns, the Supreme Court approved the transfer of the investigation to the CBI.
The apex court observed that the matter had generated intense public discussion and that several statements circulating in the media could potentially affect the fairness of the investigation. During the hearing, the court specifically advised television channels, online portals, and social media influencers to maintain restraint while reporting developments in the case.
Legal experts say the Supreme Court’s remarks are significant because media trials often influence public perception before investigators complete their work. The bench reportedly stressed that speculative reporting may harm both the investigation and the rights of individuals connected to the case.
Twisha Sharma’s death has triggered widespread reactions across social media platforms. Supporters and followers have demanded justice, while several political leaders have also commented on the matter. The situation became more complicated after conflicting claims emerged regarding the circumstances surrounding her death.
According to officials, the CBI is expected to re-examine all evidence collected so far, including forensic reports, digital communications, witness statements, and CCTV footage. Sources indicate that the agency may also question individuals who were previously examined by local authorities.
The family of Twisha Sharma welcomed the transfer of the probe, stating that they have faith in the central agency and hope the truth will emerge through an independent investigation. Family members had earlier alleged that the initial investigation was not moving in the right direction and demanded greater transparency.
Meanwhile, media organisations are now under increased scrutiny after the Supreme Court’s observations. Some channels had aired detailed debates and alleged insider claims without official confirmation, leading to criticism from legal experts and civil society groups.
Senior advocates believe the court’s intervention sends a clear message about responsible journalism, especially in sensitive criminal cases. They argue that sensational reporting can create unnecessary pressure on investigators and may even impact judicial proceedings later.
Political reactions to the development have also intensified. Opposition parties have questioned why the matter required intervention from the highest court before a central probe was approved, while ruling party leaders have maintained that due process is being followed.
The CBI is expected to register a fresh FIR and begin its independent investigation shortly. Officials familiar with the process said the agency will likely coordinate with forensic experts and review all previous findings before deciding its next steps.
As the investigation enters a new phase, public attention remains firmly fixed on the case. The coming weeks are expected to be crucial as investigators attempt to uncover the circumstances surrounding Twisha Sharma’s death while balancing public interest and judicial caution.
The Supreme Court’s request for restraint in media coverage is likely to shape how future developments are reported. For now, the focus remains on ensuring a fair, transparent, and unbiased investigation into one of the most talked-about cases in recent months.