The Hague, June 25, 2025 – Former U.S. President Donald Trump issued a stark warning from the NATO summit, stating that the fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran could unravel “perhaps soon.” The remarks, made during an address to allied leaders in the Netherlands, have reignited concerns over escalating tensions in the Middle East following a brief but intense exchange of strikes earlier this month.
While the current ceasefire holds, the situation remains precarious. Trump’s warning, delivered with characteristic bluntness, reflected the underlying volatility in the region, as well as the unpredictable nature of diplomacy when conducted in the shadow of open conflict.
The Background: A Brief War, A Fragile Peace
Tensions between Israel and Iran reached a boiling point in early June when Israel launched a series of airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military facilities. The move, which Israel claimed was in response to “imminent threats,” targeted enrichment centers and high-ranking officials in Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
In retaliation, Iran fired missiles at U.S. bases in the Gulf, particularly Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. Although no American personnel were injured, the strike drew immediate condemnation and raised fears of a broader regional war.
Following the U.S. retaliation and international pressure, a ceasefire was declared. While the agreement halted immediate hostilities, it lacked formal structure or mutual guarantees. It was in this context that Trump addressed NATO leaders, drawing attention to the fragile nature of the truce.
Trump’s Remarks: Applause and Alarm
“They were very nice—they warned us,” Trump said, referencing Iran’s advance notification to regional allies prior to its retaliatory strike. “We appreciated that. But let me tell you: this could restart, perhaps soon.”
Trump’s tone oscillated between praise and forewarning. His acknowledgment of Iran’s “restraint” stood in stark contrast to the decades-long U.S. policy that views Tehran as a threat to regional security. Nevertheless, Trump maintained that continued deterrence and strategic diplomacy were the only viable ways forward.
While some NATO officials expressed concern over Trump’s informal tone and unpredictability, others acknowledged that his direct channel to Tehran and Jerusalem may have helped prevent a wider war.
Diplomacy or Delay?
According to insiders, Trump is exploring a framework for U.S.–Iran talks focused on a phased de-escalation, potential sanction relief, and limited nuclear oversight. These discussions—if they move forward—would mark a dramatic shift from the all-out confrontation seen just weeks ago.
Trump, known for his transactional approach to foreign policy, has hinted at oil-related incentives for Iran and limited diplomatic normalization in exchange for halting uranium enrichment beyond civilian use. Tehran, however, has publicly denied any deal and insists the strikes were a “measured response” to Israeli aggression.
Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Nasser Kanaani said earlier this week, “No negotiations are taking place. The resistance will continue unless Israeli hostilities stop permanently.”
Israel’s Position: Silence as Strategy
Israel has maintained strategic ambiguity regarding its actions. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed the IDF’s operations as a “decisive blow” to Iran’s nuclear program but declined to elaborate on ceasefire terms. Domestically, Netanyahu has seen a surge in support, with many Israelis rallying behind the government’s defense-first stance.
However, international analysts remain skeptical. “At most, Israel delayed Iran’s program by a few months,” said Yossi Melman, an Israeli defense analyst. “It didn’t dismantle the capability. It didn’t end the threat.”
Trump’s public admiration for Iran’s limited response raised eyebrows in Tel Aviv, though officials declined to comment on whether they were consulted prior to Trump’s remarks at the NATO summit.
NATO and the Global Picture
This year’s NATO summit was focused on strengthening collective defense commitments, with leaders agreeing to raise defense spending goals in response to threats from Russia and China. But Trump’s focus on the Middle East once again pulled attention back to a region perpetually on the brink of chaos.
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg tried to strike a balanced tone: “Stability in the Middle East is critical for global security. We encourage all parties to maintain the ceasefire and avoid escalation.”
European leaders, particularly from France and Germany, have called for immediate diplomacy. French President Emmanuel Macron offered to host future negotiations between Iran and Western powers, including a restructured version of the now-defunct 2015 nuclear deal.
Regional Risks Still Loom
Meanwhile, the region remains a tinderbox. Iran’s allies in Lebanon and Yemen have already vowed retaliation for any future Israeli aggression. The Houthi leadership in Sanaa called U.S. involvement “an act of war,” while Hezbollah has increased patrols along the Israeli-Lebanese border.
The Biden administration, though largely silent publicly, has dispatched envoys to Amman, Cairo, and Ankara in an effort to shore up regional containment. A senior U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said: “Trump’s comments are not official U.S. policy, but they reflect the dangerous fragility of the moment.”
Outlook: Ceasefire Holding—for Now
As of June 26, no new missile strikes or aerial incursions have been reported. Iran’s Revolutionary Guard has shifted back to a defensive posture, and Israel’s air defenses remain on high alert.
But Trump’s warning—“restart perhaps soon”—hangs over the region like a storm cloud. Whether it was a bluff, a political maneuver, or an informed projection remains unclear. What is certain is that the ceasefire, while holding, remains paper-thin.
Diplomatic moves may yet cement a longer peace. But with mutual distrust, opaque intentions, and geopolitical fault lines deepening, the threat of renewed conflict is real—and may only take a single misstep to reignite.