Monday, July 7, 2025

Leaked Pentagon Report Challenges Trump’s Iran Strike Claims

Published on

Advertisement

On June 21, 2025, the Trump administration introduced a sequence of airstrikes on three main Iranian nuclear services, with President Donald Trump and Protection Secretary Pete Hegseth declaring the mission a complete success.

In line with their statements, the strikes had “fully and completely obliterated” Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, together with websites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. Trump insisted the assaults set again Iran’s nuclear program by a long time, calling it “one of the profitable army strikes in historical past”.

Categorised Intelligence Evaluation Paints a Completely different Image

Nevertheless, a leaked categorised evaluation from the Protection Intelligence Company (DIA) sharply contradicts these claims. In line with a number of sources aware of the report, the US strikes didn’t destroy Iran’s core nuclear belongings. The DIA’s early evaluation discovered that:

The strikes induced important injury to above-ground infrastructure however did not demolish the closely fortified underground services the place Iran’s most delicate nuclear work is carried out.

Entrances to 2 websites had been sealed, however the core underground buildings remained intact.

Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium was not destroyed, as a few of it had been moved earlier than the strikes.

The nation’s centrifuges, important for uranium enrichment, had been largely undamaged.

One supply summarized the evaluation: “The US set them again perhaps a couple of months, tops.” The timeline for Iran to rebuild its nuclear capabilities was prolonged by lower than six months, not a long time as claimed by the administration.

White Home Pushes Again Towards the Leaks

The White Home has strongly disputed the leaked evaluation. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt referred to as the report “flat-out improper” and accused the leaker of making an attempt to undermine President Trump and the army. She insisted that the strikes had been “completely executed” and resulted in “complete obliteration” of Iran’s nuclear program.

President Trump, talking from the NATO summit in The Hague, doubled down on his authentic claims, dismissing the intelligence findings as “pretend information” and reiterating that Iran’s nuclear websites had been “fully destroyed”.

Protection Secretary Pete Hegseth additionally defended the administration’s place, stating that the evaluation was preliminary and “low confidence.” He prompt political motives had been behind the leak and confirmed an FBI investigation was underway to establish the supply.

What Was Truly Destroyed?

In line with the DIA and different intelligence sources, the primary influence of the strikes was on above-ground infrastructure on the focused websites. Whereas the entrances to some services had been blocked, the underground elements—the place Iran’s most superior nuclear work takes place—remained largely untouched.

A few of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile was moved to undisclosed areas earlier than the assaults, minimizing the lack of nuclear materials.

Strategic Implications: Delay, Not Destruction

Some US officers and lawmakers have acknowledged that the strikes had been by no means anticipated to fully destroy Iran’s nuclear program.

Consultant Michael McCaul, chairman emeritus of the Home Overseas Affairs Committee, acknowledged, “It was by no means meant to fully destroy the nuclear services, however slightly trigger important injury… it was all the time identified to be a short lived setback”.

Ongoing Evaluation and Unanswered Questions

Intelligence officers warning that the complete influence of the strikes will take extra time to evaluate, as extra info is gathered from inside Iran and additional battle injury assessments are accomplished.

In the meantime, the leak has fueled political controversy in Washington, elevating questions in regards to the administration’s transparency and the effectiveness of army motion as a device for nuclear nonproliferation.

Whereas the Trump administration continues to tout the strikes as a historic success, the leaked Pentagon evaluation suggests the operation achieved solely a short lived delay in Iran’s nuclear ambitions, not their destruction.


For Extra Fascinating Information Observe Us on Instagram

Latest articles

Advertisement
Advertisement