 June 25, 2025 Classified Intelligence Assessment Paints a Different Picture However, a leaked classified assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) sharply contradicts these claims. According to multiple sources familiar with the report, the US strikes did not destroy Iran’s core nuclear assets. The DIA’s early analysis found that: The strikes caused significant damage to above-ground infrastructure but failed to demolish the heavily fortified underground facilities where Iran’s most sensitive nuclear work is carried out. Entrances to two sites were sealed, but the core underground structures remained intact. Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium was not destroyed, as some of it had been moved before the strikes. The country’s centrifuges, essential for uranium enrichment, were largely undamaged. One source summarized the assessment: “The US set them back maybe a few months, tops.” The timeline for Iran to rebuild its nuclear capabilities was extended by less than six months, not decades as claimed by the administration. White House Pushes Back Against the Leaks The White House has strongly disputed the leaked assessment. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt called the report “flat-out wrong” and accused the leaker of trying to undermine President Trump and the military. She insisted that the strikes were “perfectly executed” and resulted in “total obliteration” of Iran’s nuclear program. President Trump, speaking from the NATO summit in The Hague, doubled down on his original claims, dismissing the intelligence findings as “fake news” and reiterating that Iran’s nuclear sites were “completely destroyed”. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also defended the administration’s position, stating that the assessment was preliminary and “low confidence.” He suggested political motives were behind the leak and confirmed an FBI investigation was underway to identify the source. What Was Actually Destroyed? According to the DIA and other intelligence sources, the main impact of the strikes was on above-ground infrastructure at the targeted sites. While the entrances to some facilities were blocked, the underground components—where Iran’s most advanced nuclear work takes place—remained largely untouched. Some of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile was moved to undisclosed locations before the attacks, minimizing the loss of nuclear material. Strategic Implications: Delay, Not Destruction Some US officials and lawmakers have acknowledged that the strikes were never expected to completely destroy Iran’s nuclear program. Representative Michael McCaul, chairman emeritus of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, stated, “It was never meant to completely destroy the nuclear facilities, but rather cause significant damage… it was always known to be a temporary setback”. Ongoing Assessment and Unanswered Questions Intelligence officials caution that the full impact of the strikes will take more time to assess, as more information is gathered from within Iran and further battle damage assessments are completed. Meanwhile, the leak has fueled political controversy in Washington, raising questions about the administration’s transparency and the effectiveness of military action as a tool for nuclear nonproliferation. While the Trump administration continues to tout the strikes as a historic success, the leaked Pentagon assessment suggests the operation achieved only a temporary delay in Iran’s nuclear ambitions, not their destruction. For More Interesting News Follow Us on Instagram){kind=link}
On June 21, 2025, the Trump administration introduced a sequence of airstrikes on three main Iranian nuclear amenities, with President Donald Trump and Protection Secretary Pete Hegseth declaring the mission a complete success.
In line with their statements, the strikes had “fully and completely obliterated” Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, together with websites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. Trump insisted the assaults set again Iran’s nuclear program by a long time, calling it “probably the most profitable navy strikes in historical past”.
HOLY CRAP! Pete Hegseth simply RIPPED APART pretend information CNN and NYT for pushing an agenda about Iran
“Then the intuition of CNN and New York Instances is to attempt to discover a technique to spin it for their very own political causes to attempt to damage President Trump and our nation. They don’t care… pic.twitter.com/1PnONBstjx
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) June 25, 2025
Labeled Intelligence Evaluation Paints a Totally different Image
Nevertheless, a leaked labeled evaluation from the Protection Intelligence Company (DIA) sharply contradicts these claims. In line with a number of sources aware of the report, the US strikes didn’t destroy Iran’s core nuclear belongings. The DIA’s early evaluation discovered that:
The strikes brought on important harm to above-ground infrastructure however did not demolish the closely fortified underground amenities the place Iran’s most delicate nuclear work is carried out.
Entrances to 2 websites had been sealed, however the core underground constructions remained intact.
Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium was not destroyed, as a few of it had been moved earlier than the strikes.
The nation’s centrifuges, important for uranium enrichment, had been largely undamaged.
One supply summarized the evaluation: “The US set them again perhaps just a few months, tops.” The timeline for Iran to rebuild its nuclear capabilities was prolonged by lower than six months, not a long time as claimed by the administration.
White Home Pushes Again In opposition to the Leaks
The White Home has strongly disputed the leaked evaluation. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt known as the report “flat-out mistaken” and accused the leaker of making an attempt to undermine President Trump and the navy. She insisted that the strikes had been “completely executed” and resulted in “whole obliteration” of Iran’s nuclear program.
President Trump, talking from the NATO summit in The Hague, doubled down on his unique claims, dismissing the intelligence findings as “pretend information” and reiterating that Iran’s nuclear websites had been “fully destroyed”.
Protection Secretary Pete Hegseth additionally defended the administration’s place, stating that the evaluation was preliminary and “low confidence.” He advised political motives had been behind the leak and confirmed an FBI investigation was underway to establish the supply.
What Was Really Destroyed?
In line with the DIA and different intelligence sources, the primary influence of the strikes was on above-ground infrastructure on the focused websites. Whereas the entrances to some amenities had been blocked, the underground elements—the place Iran’s most superior nuclear work takes place—remained largely untouched.
A few of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile was moved to undisclosed places earlier than the assaults, minimizing the lack of nuclear materials.
Strategic Implications: Delay, Not Destruction
Some US officers and lawmakers have acknowledged that the strikes had been by no means anticipated to fully destroy Iran’s nuclear program.
Consultant Michael McCaul, chairman emeritus of the Home Overseas Affairs Committee, acknowledged, “It was by no means meant to fully destroy the nuclear amenities, however slightly trigger important harm… it was at all times recognized to be a brief setback”.
Ongoing Evaluation and Unanswered Questions
Intelligence officers warning that the complete influence of the strikes will take extra time to evaluate, as extra info is gathered from inside Iran and additional battle harm assessments are accomplished.
In the meantime, the leak has fueled political controversy in Washington, elevating questions concerning the administration’s transparency and the effectiveness of navy motion as a instrument for nuclear nonproliferation.
Whereas the Trump administration continues to tout the strikes as a historic success, the leaked Pentagon evaluation suggests the operation achieved solely a brief delay in Iran’s nuclear ambitions, not their destruction.
For Extra Fascinating Information Comply with Us on Instagram